| THE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAMME FOR THE INNER CITY HOMELESS COMMUNITY OF JOHANNESBURG |
||||||||||||||||||
| paper
presented at the URBAN FUTURES 2000 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Johannesburg 10-14 July 2000 LONE POULSEN |
||||||||||||||||||
| 1. INTRODUCTION The Transitional Housing Programme came about as a result of an initiative by the Inner City Shelter Forum of the Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council (GJTMC) to develop strategies for dealing with homelessness in Johannesburg. Gauteng is the only Province to have a formal programme for Transitional Housing and the Transitional Housing Implementation Team (TRHIT) was formed to facilitate and co-ordinate the pilot programme of five Transitional Housing facilities in Johannesburg. During the implementation process it has become very clear that Transitional Housing plays a very important role in the delivery of housing to homeless persons. However, it has also become evident that there are gaps in delivery at both ends of where Transitional Housing fits into the broader housing programme. This has lead to two fundamental questions; firstly, what facilities are there for people who do not qualify for Transitional Housing and secondly, where do people move to after transitional housing? In addition, the role of other government departments such as welfare, health, education/training and employment need to be reviewed in terms of their contribution to the programme. This paper aims to evaluate the Transitional Housing programme as an appropriate form of housing for the least empowered community in the city. The paper begins with the background to the Transitional Housing pilot programme and outlines the aims and objectives of the programme. This is followed by a brief description of the five established projects, and then discusses some of the achievements and problems encountered in the implementation of the pilot projects. Finally, the paper evaluates the projects and makes some recommendations for the future of the programme. The information in the paper is obtained through participation in the Inner City Shelter Forum and Transitional Housing Implementation Team meetings over the last two years. In addition, there has been direct involvement with the programme and interaction with management and residents of all of the pilot projects. This interaction lead to the formulation of a proposal for a broader evaluation of the programme to motivate for Transitional Housing to be incorporated into national housing policy; involvement in the current development of a monitoring programme to be applied to the five pilot projects; and consultation on proposals for the implementation of new Transitional Housing projects. Acknowledgement should also be given to students in the Department of Architecture at the University of the Witwatersrand who conducted pilot surveys in each of the Transitional Housing facilities as part of the `Home and Away= Studio on a project called : A.......a place between.......@ |
||||||||||||||||||
| 2.
BACKGROUND TO THE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAMME After the first democratic elections in South Africa, there were a number organisations concerned with the plight of homeless persons in the inner city of Johannesburg. The Inner City Shelter Forum was formed in June 1995 as a partnership between local government and community organisations to address effective and efficient ways of dealing with homelessness. The strategy for Transitional Housing grew out of the Inner City Shelter Forum and lead to the adoption of a `Policy on Inner City Transitional Housing= in July 1996 by the Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council (GJTMC). The Forum then focussed on the role of the Provincial and National Government Housing Departments in enabling Transitional Housing to be incorporated into the provisions for institutional housing subsidies. In October 1997, the `Interim Guidelines for the Subsidisation of Temporary Shelters : Pilot Project : Gauteng= was adopted by the National Ministry of Housing and Housing MEC=s (MINMEC) in all Provinces as the basis for a pilot programme of Transitional Housing. The Interim Guidelines are an Annexure to the Provincial Housing Board document : Volume A, Housing Subsidy Scheme, Part Seven, Guidelines for Institutional Subsidies, November 1995, Vol A - P7 .This meant that the Provincial Housing Board (PHB) could grant subsidies to projects submitting proposals which met the criteria outlined in the guidelines. Organisations need to demonstrate that the proposals are financially viable and that they have the necessary managerial expertise to implement the project successfully. The organisation should either own the property or have a registered lease of not less than twenty years on the property to be eligible for approval of subsidies. The subsidy is in the form of an initial capital payment only; ongoing management and maintenance is to be funded by the organisations themselves. The subsidy payouts are administered as progress payments upon the completion of agreed milestones. Up to 70% of the subsidy can be paid out prior to completion on condition that the beneficiaries have been identified, and the remaining 30% is paid out on full occupation of the project. The projects are aimed at providing temporary accommodation to destitute and homeless people. The subsidy is in the amount of R3750.00 per unit (bed) or R15000.00 per family (assumed to be the equivalent of 4 beds) and is allocated according to the mix of persons and/or families to be accommodated in the project. Qualifying beneficiaries are persons who less than R1250.00 per month; or families who earn less than R2500.00 month. Eligible beneficiaries must be lawfully resident in South Africa; must be over 18 years of age, except for children who are under parental guidance or adult care givers; and excludes persons who are receiving an old age pensions or other grants. The tenure arrangements are that the accommodation should remain available to persons in temporary situations and not be permanent accommodation. Occupation is limited to a six month period and can only be extended in special circumstances with the approval of the PHB. The organisations are required to enter into lease agreements with the occupants based on established admission criteria, house rules and monthly rental amounts. The institutional arrangements for management of the project must include representation of the occupants through a residents committee. The organisation is also required to keep books, present audited financial statements to the PHB and institute mechanisms to monitor the success of the project. |
||||||||||||||||||
| 3. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAMME The aims and objectives of the Transitional Housing programme is to provide temporary accommodation to destitute and impoverished homeless people living in inner city areas. This is to be achieved through the adaptation and upgrading of existing inner city buildings. In addition, the programme attempts to bridge the gap between homelessness and the ability to reintegrate with society. Firstly, through the provision of rental accommodation for persons earning between R400.00 and R1250.00 per month and ultimately aiming to link occupants to affordable permanent housing. Secondly, through development and support initiatives that empower the homeless, such as, personal upliftment programmes, establishing linkages to other training programmes, employment opportunities, encouraging entrepreneurship and assisting people to develop viable business opportunities. Thirdly, by facilitating access to education, health and welfare programmes; and fourthly, networking within the Transitional Housing Programme for linkages to opportunities, and developing mutual and shared experiences to inform other initiatives. The Transitional Housing pilot programme has been in operation for a period of time now, and the Transitional Housing Implementation Team has embarked on a process of monitoring the five facilities. The monitoring programme being implemented is an essential and ongoing process to learn from, and to inform new initiatives, as well as, to explore other options and alternatives. The identified successes and problems can then be analysed and the PHB policy adapted as part of the process of motivating for Transitional Housing to be recognised within the general housing delivery programme. Although, the five facilities are all called Transitional Housing they are very different in the way in which they function and manage their facilities; their location in the city; the services and support offered and; the accommodation and living environments which they provide. What follows is a brief description of each of the five Transitional Housing projects. |
||||||||||||||||||
| 4. THE FIVE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PILOT PROJECTS The five facilities listed below are the five involved in the pilot programme for Transitional Housing :
|
||||||||||||||||||
| 5.
EVALUATION OF THE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PILOT PROJECTS From the brief description of the five pilot project above it can be seen that there are similarities and differences in the way in which they operate, the persons they cater for and the accommodation which is provided. The following evaluation is therefore done on the basis of three main areas of investigation as follows: (i) the organisational structure and management (ii) the profile of the beneficiaries (iii) the living environment The overall aim of the paper is to investigate the similarities and differences between the facilities in order to establish guidelines for future transitional housing projects, to make recommendations about the future of the transitional housing programme and to uncover the gaps in the programme of housing delivery to poor homeless persons. (i) the organisational structure and management All the projects have obtained capital funding through the Provincial Housing Board in the form of the institutional subsidies allocated in terms of the interim guidelines for transitional housing. However, all rely very heavily on outside funding and assistance for the daily running and maintenance of the facilities. All the projects have established admissions criteria and residents committees based on the requirements of the Provincial Housing Board, as well as, a set of house rules developed by each of the five projects depending on the facilities and management style. All the projects are run by dedicated and well intentioned organisations. The problems encountered relate to the funding of the projects and the implementation of effective management structures. In terms of funding a distinction needs to be made between initial costs and long term sustainability costs. The PHB subsidy provides a once off capital payment based on the number of units to be provided. However, the subsidy funding is not enough to implement the project, acquire land and buildings and to cover the cost of construction and refurbishment, and additional funds need to be obtained from other sources. The amount of money raised often limits the extent to which buildings can be renovated and adapted for use as Transitional Housing. Some of the buildings which have been made available for this kind of housing are basically unsuitable, and require extensive adaptation and remodelling, which is more costly than simpler conversions of more suitable buildings. Thus, funds are often stretched very thinly to get as much as possible for the money available, but means that compromises are made in terms of finishes and choices of materials which then sets the project up for high maintenance costs in the longer term. The day to day running costs are not subsidised in any way by government sources, and the managing organisations are therefore required to ensure ongoing fundraising to sustain the projects, as the rentals charged cannot cover all the costs. Some of the projects are located in areas where they are being charged commercial or industrial rates and tariffs, which are high compared to residentially zoned areas. Mechanism for reduction of service charges would greatly benefit the financial management of the ongoing monthly costs of running the projects. Good management structures are crucial to the success of the project and much has been learned through some difficult experiences about this aspect of the implementation of Transitional Housing projects. Management relates to the general running and upkeep of the project, as well as, the relationship with residents through residents committees and on an individual basis. The establishment and adherence to admissions criteria and house rules is critical in order to ensure harmonious co-habitation. Communal living requires a respect for others rights, property and privacy. Management interaction with the residents needs to be compassionate and understanding of peoples problems, but at the same time, firm and consistent in approach. The fact that residents are often in non-permanent employment means that they are unable to meet the regular payment of rentals. Thus, rental collection and mechanisms for managing arrears becomes an important issue. Residents committees are important in communication and understanding issues from both management and residents points of view. An inclusive and transparent approach enables residents to see where costs occur and the consequences of non-payment. Security aspects are important in terms of feelings of well being and safety of the residents. However, there needs to be a balance between the need for control and the need for freedom of movement. Empowerment and support programmes are essential in preparing residents for reintegration into society. A regular routine is a stabilising factor and taking responsibility for ones life helps to reinstate a sense of dignity and self-esteem. However, the experience of the Transitional Housing programme is that six months is not long enough to get people on their feet and the occupation time frame has been extended to 18 months. Problems have been experienced in the implementation and the management of all the projects but one of the most valuable outcomes of this programme is the sharing of these experiences which has enabled projects to learn form each other and assist each other in the resolution of problem areas. (ii) profile of the beneficiaries The beneficiaries vary from project to project and relates to the location and context in the city. It is clear that there is no typical profile as, the residents range from young to old, male and female, single persons, couples, single parents, families and extended families. This makes it difficult create typical models of support and facilitate efficient access to appropriate resources as the needs are very complex. Most residents are in need of some social guidance and upliftment programmes. Access to social welfare, pensions, rehabilitation assistance, education and training are all important structures to link up with and more could be done in this respect. Many families struggle to pay school fees and are unable to afford child care for young children and aftercare for school children which further limits the possibilities for obtaining work, or leaves the children to their own devices. Although there is a high percentage of persons with a low skills levels, there are others who are very skilled but are unable to find employment. A vicious cycle of poverty ensues, where there is a lack of confidence, low self esteem, limited work experience and high competition for jobs. Most people are in semi-permanent employment and are therefore, not in a stable situation and find it difficult to move on. There are also many socialisation problems when people are sharing in minimal conditions. Sharing of facilities blurs the distinctions between communal and private activities. Responsibility towards oneself and the collective become difficult to mange when people are barely existing and living from hand to mouth. In a condition of transition it is difficult to establish a sense of ownership when relationships are temporary and there is an ongoing integration of new people. (iii) the living environment The quality of the accommodation varies a great deal from project to project which has both social and management implications. The intention of Transitional Housing is to enable large numbers of people to move through the projects. This means that the facilities are in constant and extensive use. The choice of materials, finishes and equipment is crucial. There is a direct relationship between maintenance and cleanliness to the initial investment in the buildings. Shared ablution facilities which have floor and ceiling tiles are both easier to clean and look hygienic, compared to bathrooms finished with applied surface treatments which are difficult to maintain and clean and thus end up being and looking grubby and unhygienic. The same principles apply to other areas of high usage such as kitchens and communal areas. Thus, there needs to be a balance between short term investment and long terms maintenance costs. The quality of the buildings and the appropriateness of the built fabric of the Transitional Housing projects vary greatly. Spatial quality and spatial standards vary from project to project. The concern relates to how easy and comfortable it is for relative strangers to share accommodation, both at the level of sleeping spaces and communal collective spaces. Questions of personal space and privacy become areas for conflict and/or engendering respect for fellow residents. In communal spaces it becomes difficult to establish who takes responsibility and who monitors who with regard to use and abuse. Most of the projects have provided the bare minimum with regard to private and communal spaces; and compromises have been made within the constraints of the built fabric and the financial budget available. There has also, been very little regard for the importance of social spaces which serve the specific needs of children and adults, both indoors and outdoors. Transitional Housing is caught in the very delicate dilemma between providing short term accommodation which is better than being on the street and/or other unacceptable living environments; and not being too comfortable to become permanent accommodation. Living environments which enable people to get their lives together but still feel a certain amount of discomfort to encourage them to move onto something better. The question becomes how does Transitional Housing provide comfort and human dignity at the most minimal level, and at the same time retain the intention of a place of transition to a better life. |
||||||||||||||||||
| 6.
EVALUATION OF THE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAMME The final section of the paper considers the Transitional Housing programme and makes some recommendations for the future. A comprehensive evaluation of the Transitional Housing projects is needed which investigates much more carefully the relationship between management, the needs of people in transition and the quality of the spatial environment. It would be useful to conduct a comparative evaluation of the pilot projects which establishes more detailed guidelines for the viability of implementing Transitional Housing projects through appropriate management structures; admissions procedures which evaluate peoples needs and facilitates referrals to suitable forms of accommodation and/or social service support; and sets spatial standards and amenity requirements for Transitional Housing. The strong need for support other than just housing has become clear and the relationship to other government institutions and departments needs to be strengthened in order to set up effective linkages and referral mechanisms. These links include welfare, health, education, training and job creation. The issue of initial funding versus long term financial costs needs to addressed at a number of levels. The type of buildings made available for Transitional Housing could reduce the cost of conversions, create better residential living environments and more social spaces. The investment in material finishes can substantially affect the ongoing running and maintenance costs. Subsidised or relief on the payment of rates and services tariffs would improve the financial viability of the projects. The National and Provincial subsidy policy for this form of housing should be reviewed to include some form of ongoing subsidy for management and maintenance. The institutional subsidy at present is limited to a once off capital payment but if Transitional Housing is to achieve its objectives then the allocation of a subsidy to one `unit= would over time benefit many `units= and, therefore, a form of operational subsidy would greatly improve the long term sustainability of the project. The question of who is benefiting from the Transitional Housing programme is an important one. In a context where there is a shortage of all forms of housing this is a complex question. Transitional Housing caters for those who earn between R400 and R1250 per month. This income bracket however, includes many persons who are not necessarily considered to be homeless or destitute but who are in informal or non-permanent employment. At the same time, the income criteria does not cater for those who earn below the lower limit, who are by implication excluded and therefore, what housing provisions are being made for them. At the other end of the period of transition there is very little affordable `formal= provision of housing for people from Transitional Housing to move to. It is critical to develop an understanding of where Transitional Housing fits into the broader National and Provincial policy for the delivery of housing. Thus, there is a need to establish the extent of the need for Transitional Housing which currently caters for a fairly small percentage of homeless destitute persons. Simultaneously, there is a need to make recommendations for other forms of housing and service provision eg. basic shelters, perhaps as assessment places which recommend persons for Transitional Housing and/or refer people to other forms of housing, rehabilitation centres etc. The most critical link in the housing provision chain however, is access to affordable housing after Transitional Housing. Current provision of social housing tends to be too expensive and the rental gap is too high for people to cope with whilst still in a relatively unstable employment situation. At present there are persons within Transitional Housing who could probably move on to better accommodations if it were affordable. Simultaneously, there are persons who are unable cope with the costs of Transitional Housing and therefore, have to leave. Either way people at either end of the Transitional Housing spectrum may well fall back into a destitute homeless situation. There can be little doubt that Transitional Housing is playing an important role in the provision of accommodation for destitute and homeless persons. However, unless there is serious consideration given to access to affordable housing to move onto the transitional housing programme will fail in its intentions of being a place of transition and people may instead re-enter an cycle of homelessness. REFERENCES C Heynen, H. (1999). Architecture and modernity a critique. Cambridge: MIT C B. Wallis ed. (1991). If you lived here. Seattle : Bay Press C H. Judin and I. Vladislavic eds. (1998). Blank_____ architecture, apartheid and after. Rotterdam: NAi (selected essays) C Morgan, J. (1999). Looking for Mr Madini. Cape Town: David Philip C Olufemi, Olusola. (1998). Street Homelessness in Johannesburg inner-city: a preliminary survey. Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 10, No.2, October 1998. INTERNET REFERENCES C South African Migration Project : http://www.queensu.ca/samp/publications C Homeless Talk : http://www.homelesstalk.org.za GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS C National Department of Housing, HOUSING SUBSIDY IMPLEMENTATION MANUAL : VOLUME A, HOUSING SUBSIDY SCHEME, PART SEVEN (VOL A -7), Guidelines for Institutional Subsidies, November 1995. C Annexure 7A of Part Seven of Volume A (VOL A - P7 - ANNEX 7A) APPLICATION BY INDIVIDUALS FOR PARTICIPATION IN INSTITUTIONAL SUBSIDY SCHEME (Nov. 1995) C Annexure A AMENDMENTS TO INSTITUTIONAL SUBSIDIES PART SEVEN OF VOLUME A C Annexure A INTERIM GUIDELINES FOR THE SUBSIDISATION OF TEMPORARY SHELTERS : GAUTENG : PILOT PROJECTS. CONSULTATIONS AND INTERVIEWS Participation in the committee meetings of : THE INNER CITY COMMUNITY FORUM THE INNER CITY SHELTER FORUM THE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION TEAM THE FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROJECT Interviews and interactions with management, staff and residents of Transitional Housing Projects FACILITY CORNELIUS HOUSE Chris Lund, Theo Molobi HI-LIFE CENTRE June van der Nat, Cindy Muthwa, Brian Kubheka IMMACULATA HOUSE Sr,St. John Enright, Jacob Modise, Selby Dishaba PUTADITJHABA HOUSE Toni Easton, Ebrahim Modimkwane, James Mkwane EKUTHALENI Renier Erasmus, Lucky Acknowledgement and thanks should also be given to the students in the Department of Architecture, University of the Witwatersrand, for the pilot surveys which they conducted in the five Transitional Housing projects as part of a project entitled A.....a place between.....@ , during the `At Home and Away= all school studio. Cornelius House : Nadine Clark, Michelle Dauncey, Lam Wut Ho, Ben Mugabe Hi-life Centre : Gordon Lindsay, Kathleen Rough, Meg Tullis Immaculata : Craig Dalziel, Pamela Gates, Mathew Wiggett Phutaditjaba : Marcelle Booysen, Marco Cecilio, Relebohile Molomo, Dylan Pin Wei Ekuthuleni : Ryan Astrap, Mark Jackson, Dale Scott, Philip Rutkiewicz, James Wylie
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|